Back to top

Database

Budget 2017 - Decoder : Part V

JUMP TO
  • 2017-02-09

With an effort to decode and simplify the amendments of Finance Bill, 2017, we bring to you a summary of the amendments vide a series of editions beginning from today. 

 

Capital Gains 

  1. Sec. 43, 35AD : Disallowance of depreciation u/s 32 and capital expenditure u/s 35AD on cash payment

Amendment : Disallowance of depreciation u/s. 32 and capital expenditure u/s. 35AD on cash payment -

  1. It is proposed to amend the provisions of Sec. 43 to provide in the definition of 'actual cost' that where an assessee incurs any expenditure for acquisition of any asset in respect which a payment or aggregate of payments made to a person in a day, otherwise than by an account payee cheque/ bank draft or use of electronic clearing system through a bank account, exceeds Rs. 10,000, such expenditure shall be ignored for the purposes of determination of actual cost of such asset.
  2. It is further proposed to amend Sec. 35AD to provide that any expenditure in respect of which payment or aggregate of payments made in cash in excess of Rs. 10,000, no deduction shall be allowed in respect of such expenditure. Amendment will take effect from April 1, 2018. 

Relevant Ruling(s) :

1. ACIT vs Ambika Sugars Ltd [TS-6828-ITAT-2016(CHENNAI)-O]

‘Actual Cost’ of power plants acquired through amalgamation of power generating subsidiary shall be the same as it would have been if the amalgamating company had continued to hold the capital asset for its own business after claiming depreciation under straight line method.

2. Electrosteel Castings Ltd vs DCIT [TS-6888-ITAT-2016(KOLKATA)-O]

Where Government subsidy is intended as an incentive to encourage entrepreneurs to move to backward areas and establish industries, is not a payment to meet any portion of the actual cost and hence, cannot be deducted from the actual cost u/s. 43(1) for the purpose allowing depreciation.

 

  1. Sec. 47 : Providing tax neutrality for conversion of preference shares to equity shares

Amendment : In order to provide tax neutrality to the conversion of preference share of a company into equity share of that company, it is proposed to amend Sec. 47 to provide that the conversion of preference share of a company into its equity share shall not be regarded as transfer. Consequential amendments are also proposed in Sec. 49 and Sec. 2(42A) in respect of cost of acquisition and period of holding. Amendment will take effect from April 1, 2018

 

 

Relevant Ruling(s) :

1. Addl. CIT vs Trustees of H.E.H. The Nizam’s Second Supplementary Trust [TS-5367-HC-1974(ANDHRA PRADESH)-O]

Conversion of preference shares into ordinary shares is a transfer by way of "exchange" within the meaning of s. 45 of the IT Act, 1961

 

 

  1. Sec. 49 : Cost of acquisition in Tax neutral demerger of a foreign company, Cost of Acquisition for units in Consolidating scheme of mutual fund

Amendment : It is proposed to amend Sec.49 so as to provide that cost of acquisition of the shares of Indian company referred to in Sec. 47(vic) in the hands of the resulting foreign company shall be the same as it was in the hands of demerged foreign company. Amendment will take effect from April 1, 2018; Sec 2(42A) and Sec 49 is proposed to be amended to provide that cost of acquisition of the units in the consolidated plan of mutual fund scheme shall be the cost of units in consolidating plan of mutual fund scheme and period of holding of the units of consolidated plan of mutual fund scheme shall include the period for which the units in consolidating plan of mutual fund scheme were held by the assessee. These amendments will take effect accordingly, from 1st April, 2017.

 

 

  1. Sec. 2(42A), 49: Cost of Acquisition for units in Consolidating scheme of mutual fund

Amendment : Sec 2(42A) and Sec 49 is proposed to be amended to provide that cost of acquisition of the units in the consolidated plan of mutual fund scheme shall be the cost of units in consolidating plan of mutual fund scheme and period of holding of the units of consolidated plan of mutual fund scheme shall include the period for which the units in consolidating plan of mutual fund scheme were held by the assessee. These amendments will take effect accordingly, from 1st April, 2017.

 

 

  1. Sec. 48 :Extension of capital gain exemption to Rupee Denominated Bonds

Amendment : In order further provide relief in respect of gains arising on account of appreciation of rupee against a foreign currency at the time of redemption of rupee denominated bond of an Indian company to secondary holders as well, it is proposed to amend Sec. 48 providing that the said appreciation of rupee shall be ignored for the purposes of computation of full value of consideration. 2. Further, with a view to facilitate transfer of Rupee Denominated Bonds from nonresident to non-resident, it is proposed to amend Sec. 47 so as to provide that any transfer of capital asset, being rupee denominated bond of Indian company issued outside India, by a non- resident to another non- resident shall not be regarded as transfer. Amendment will take effect from April 1, 2018. 

 

 

  1. Sec. 50CA : Substitution of prescribed FMV on share transfer, to be full value of consideration

Amendment : It is proposed to insert a new Sec 50CA to provide that where consideration for transfer of share of a company (other than quoted share) is less than the Fair Market Value (FMV) of such share determined in accordance with the prescribed manner, the FMV shall be deemed to be the full value of consideration for the purposes of computing income under the head "Capital gains". This amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2018.

 

Relevant Ruling(s) :

1. DCIT vs Rajan Pai [TS-5468-ITAT-2016(BANGALORE)-O]

Fair Market Value of Bonus shares cannot be taxed u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) by considering them as shares received without payment of consideration

2. Redington (India) Ltd vs JCIT [TS-419-ITAT-2014(CHNY)-O]

Transfer of shares in subsidiary, by way of 'gift', to an overseas step down subsidiary (in Cayman Island), not taxable as capital gains u/s 45.

 

 

Anti - Abuse Measures

 

  1. Sec. 11(1)(a)/(b): Charitable trusts: Corpus donations not be treated as ‘application of income’

Amendment : It is proposed to insert a new Explanation to section 11 of the Act to provide that any amount credited or paid out of contributions [which is considered as Trust’s income u/s Sec 11(1)(a)/(b)], being with specific direction that they shall form part of the corpus of the trust or institution, shall not be treated as application of income. It is also proposed to insert a proviso in Sec 10(23C) so as to provide similar restriction as above on the entities exempt under subclauses (iv), (v), (vi) or (via) of said clause in respect of any amount credited or paid out of their income. These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2018 

 

 

Relevant Ruling(s) :

1. Vels Institute of Science Technology and Advanced Studies (Vistas) vs Addl. CIT [TS-6809-ITAT-2016(CHENNAI)-O]

Corpus donation received by assessee for specific purpose cannot be treated as revenue receipt and same should be considered as capital receipt and not liable to be taxed.

2. Thermax Social Initiative Foundation vs ITO [TS-7018-ITAT-2016(PUNE)-O]

Voluntary contribution of Thermax Ltd towards corpus of the trust cannot be included in the income of the assessee in clear terms of section 11(1)(d).

 

 

  1. Sec. 11 or 12A: Clarity of procedure in respect of change or modifications of object in case of entities exempt under sections 11 and 12

Amendment : It has been proposed to amend section 12A such that the registration of trust will have to be done afresh if the objects of the trust are modified by the assessee and where the objects which do not conform to the conditions of registration. The application for fresh registration needs to be made within a period of thirty days from the date of such adoption or modifications of the objects. The proposal has been made in light of lack of clarity in respect of fresh registration where existing.

 

Relevant Ruling(s) :

1. Board of Control for Cricket in India vs ITO [TS-251-ITAT-2012(MUM)-O]

Mumbai ITAT rules that when a registration is validly held by a trust or institution, if there are changes to the by-laws or objects of the trust, assessee should approach the registering authority again; It was also holds that benefits flowing therefrom, cannot be extended to the amended objects of the society unless the DIT examines the same and comes to a conclusion that the registration under section 12A, can be extended to the revised objects, memorandum and bylaws.

2. CIT vs IILM Foundation Academy [TS-5827-HC-2016(PUNJAB & HARYANA)-O]

HC upholds ITAT rulings wherein ITAT had set aside CIT order; CIT had declined registration merely by reading its ancillary objects as its main objects.

 

Masha Rocks